In the right place
'Jesus never promised an easy or comfortable ride for those who
follow him'
Read Luke 2:41-52
St Luke, who it is generally agreed was probably the actual writer
of this gospel, was both a doctor and historian. It's clear right
from the opening words of the Gospel that a lot of care and detailed
attention had been given to presenting his reader with as detailed
an account of the life and purpose of Jesus as he could manage.
In chapter one (and reading in a modern translation) he states emphatically
'Most honourable Theophilus:
Luke had plenty of opportunity to obtain
good reliable source material. For two years he was Paul's companion
in imprisonment in Caesarea, and as a companion of Paul he must
have had easy access to many influential figures in the early church.
He was also the only New Testament writer who was not a Jew.
When looking at any of the Gospels it's useful to have at the back
of your mind a little bit of knowledge about the writer. It's rather
like reading an old letter in a museum. If it's by say, an author
that you know and love, or a politician who was very much in the
public eye when the letter was originally penned, then that background
knowledge can help us to read between the lines. We're better able
to understand about the writer and his or her attitude towards those
for whom the letter was intended.
If the letter is from someone we know nothing about, then it's
a cold piece of history, which is difficult to relate to.
As someone brought up in the Anglican tradition, I have to say
that there is some justification in saying that non-conformists
have missed out on some of the symbolism of the Protestant and Catholic
tradition. Next time you venture inside a cathedral or large parish
church, look at the stained glass windows and see if there are panels
dedicated to the gospel writers (many have one). To each writer
you will probably find attached a symbol.
Although these do vary, one of the commonest layouts is this
The symbol of Mark is a man. The gospel is straightforward and
simply told - a report of Jesus' life
The symbol of Matthew is a lion. Matthew was a Jew writing for
Jews, and he saw in Jesus the Messiah, the lion of the tribe of
Judah, the one whom all the prophets had predicted
The emblem of John is the eagle. The eagle can fly higher than
most birds. Tradition has it that of all the creatures on earth
only the eagle can look straight into the sun. John's is the theological
gospel, it's train of thoughts rather higher than the others.
The symbol of Luke is the calf. The calf is the animal for sacrifice;
and Luke saw in Jesus the sacrifice for the entire world. In Luke
all prejudices and barriers are broken down, because Jesus is for
Jew and gentile, saint and sinner alike. He is the saviour of the
world. It's a gospel full of warmth, centring on Jesus' mercy and
forgiveness. Luke doesn't quote lots of Old Testament passages as
Matthew does, in order to relate the life of Jesus in a way that
might appeal to Jews, but presents his message simply, for people
very much like ourselves to understand.
So how does this little bit of knowledge about Luke help us to
understand why he tells us about this episode in Jesus' life, which
none of the other three gospel writers include?
On first reading it seems rather like one of those nightmare occurrences
which all parents fear. One minute you know exactly where your children
are, the next they're gone - wandered off somewhere, or lagged behind
and got lost
41
Every year Jesus parents went
to Jerusalem for the Passover festival. 42 When
Jesus was twelve years old, they attended the festival as usual.
43 After the celebration was over,
they started home to Nazareth, but Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem.
His parents didnt miss him at first, 44
because they assumed he was with friends among the other travellers.
But when he didnt show up that evening, they started to look
for him among their relatives and friends. 45
When they couldnt find him, they
went back to Jerusalem to search for him there. 46
Three days later they finally discovered him.
Three days, it took them. Can you imagine the distress that they
must have suffered. Today there would have been extended Police
searches, house to house enquiries, TV appeals for witnesses to
come forward
and the ever present fear of all
the horrible things that could have happened to a much loved son.
How could they have lost track of Jesus for this length of time?
Well, apparently the women in a caravan started out much earlier
than the men, for they travelled more slowly. Men and women wouldn't
meet up until the evening camp was reached. This was Jesus' first
Passover. Can we imagine perhaps Mary thinking he was with Joseph,
and Joseph thinking he was with Mary, or both of them thinking he
was walking with friends and the awful reality not sinking in until
nightfall when they met at camp.
So they hurry back to Jerusalem and eventually find the young boy
calmly listening and chatting to the religious leaders and teachers
in the Temple Court. Cue some rather sharp words and a lot of emotional
relief
46 Three days later they finally discovered him. He was in the
Temple, sitting among the religious teachers, discussing deep questions
with them. 47 And all who heard him were amazed at his understanding
and his answers.48 His parents didnt
know what to think. "Son!" his mother said to him. "Why
have you done this to us? Your father and I have been frantic, searching
for you everywhere."
This is good human-interest stuff, but it still doesn't answer
the question of why Luke decided to use the story. After all, if
anything it shows Jesus up to be somewhat un-loving, putting his
mum and dad through all that anguish.
It's in the next line that we get to the answer. This is what Luke
wants to get across to his reader, one of the key verses in the
whole of the life of Jesus as we have it in the gospels
"Why have you done this to us? Your father and I have been
frantic, searching for you everywhere."49 "But
why did you need to search?" he asked. "You
should have known that I would be in my Fathers house."
50 But they didnt understand what he meant.
Do we?
Do you see how Jesus takes the word 'father' as used by Mary of
Joseph, and gives it to God?
We don't know when Jesus started to realise his true identity.
We can assume that it wasn't as a baby in a manger or at his mother's
breast, but as he got older he surely must have sensed something.
Maybe it was at this moment, this symbolic moment as a Jew when
at the age of twelve he would be acknowledged as a man, a son
of the law and had to take the obligations of the law upon himself,
that the pieces started falling into place. Maybe it was here, in
the temple, hearing the teachers and asking questions of them that
he sensed that this was where he was meant to be at that moment
in time. That his sense of priority had even to override his love
for parents at this time, because this was a defining moment in
Jesus' life.
There is no sense here that Jesus was being rebellious, because
we read just a verse or two later that:
Then he returned to Nazareth with them
and was obedient to them; and his mother stored all these things
in her heart. 52 So Jesus grew both
in height and in wisdom, and he was loved by God and by all who
knew him.
Matthew if he'd been using this passage would have been at pains
to link it to Old Testament prophecy, and show how Jesus was the
fulfillment of that prophecy. Luke's not like that. Here he seems
to have gathered a quite believable account of a week in the life
of Jesus the child becoming (at least in the eyes of the Jews) Jesus
the man. It's a week that would have been remembered well by Jesus'
parents and friends, all those involved in the hunt to find the
lost boy.
It's more than possible in an age where the oral tradition was
so strong, that this episode was still doing the rounds when Luke
was so painstakingly collecting his history, and Luke realized just
how defining a moment it was.
Luke is the only Gospel writer to provide much by way of history
of Jesus' birth and infancy, linking it to a time and place, as
if to emphasis to the reader the humanity of his Saviour. Now he
includes a passage that at least gives us a hint of Jesus the child
and teenager. He leaves us wondering if it actually was as he was
seated in the Temple - in his Father's House, as he called it -
that Jesus started to understand who he was and his true purpose.
His parents knew he was special, but it's obvious from Mary's reply
that she had failed to comprehend Jesus' true nature - as indeed
did the disciples until he approached Jerusalem for the last time.
Nowhere else other than in some apocryphal books is this period
in Jesus' life touched, which is perhaps rather surprising. Perhaps
Luke was aware of this gap and sought out what oral history there
was, so that he could present his reader with a more complete biography.
As I've hinted before, there's one particular phrase in our reading
that deserves a little deeper thought
"But why did you need to search?"
he asked. "You should have known that
I would be in my Fathers house."
Doing what God wants us to do, being where God wants us to be,
staying close to him - are these important things in our lives?
To Jesus these things were of higher priority even than family,
and that wasn't Jesus being disrespectful or disobedient, just Jesus
doing what he knew he had to do, being where he knew he ought to
be at that particular moment in time.
Doing what God wants us to do, being where God wants us to be.
Have you ever thought about these things with respect to your own
life? Have you ever looked at your situation and thought 'There's
something not right, it's time to move on!' or conversely 'This
is where I'm meant to be.' Or maybe had this niggling voice in your
head saying ' I'm calling you to do something for me, are you listening?'
Of course, what's right for you and I may well be totally different,
because God did not create us as robots but as individuals, and
individuals with strengths and weaknesses. We need to prayerfully
seek out answers to these questions in our own minds.
Are we in the place that God wants us to be? And I don't just mean
the four walls of a 19th Century Chapel. Are we spiritually
at the place God would have us be, or have we stopped walking with
Him and decided to take a break, do our own thing for a while?
These questions of course can also be asked collectively of a congregation.
The Church as a whole, needs to look at where its priorities lie.
It needs to address the same questions, needs to ask of itself 'Are
we doing what God wants us to do at this moment in time?' and 'Are
we in the place that God wants us to be?' Are we in the right place
spiritually?
Are we individually and collectively people that God can use?
The Church in this country is very much at a critical point in
its history. No longer can it rest on its laurels spiritually and
hope that all will come good in the end. If we look further than
our own national boundaries we find that in many parts of the world
the Christian Church is a growing, vibrant fellowship of believers.
Churches are bulging at the seams. Even in a country such as China,
still heavily regulated by the state, the Church is enjoying a period
of unprecedented growth. Yet here our denominations talk of too
few ministers, too many buildings, dwindling congregations and a
steady decline.
Jesus gives us by his own example part of the answer. It is to
sort out where our priorities should lie, for if we don't then how
can we begin to understand our own mission and ministry in this
town? How can we become effective as a part of the body of Christ
in this place, and how can we start to grow into the fellowship
that God our heavenly father would have us grow into?
Are we going to remain forever the young child in the temple, or
grow into the adult who knows full well who he is and what he must
do?
Jesus knew where his priorities lay. Despite his love for his parents
he knew he had to stay in the temple for those three days, to draw
close to God and begin to understand something of the task which
he would face some 18 years or so in the future. He had to maintain
his focus despite all the distractions of life, and his focus was
clearly on his heavenly Father.
This was, of course, something that his parents would now have
to come to terms with as well.
Luke paints a picture of Jesus coming to terms with who he was,
and the picture he paints is one that we can relate to just as easily
as the first readers of his gospel, because it's all about relationships
and conflicts.
Sometimes decisions such as these that are prayerfully made can
cause distress in the short term, but then Jesus never promised
an easy or comfortable ride for those who follow him. But what would
have happened if Jesus had never made that decision, hadn't responded
to that feeling - that here he was at home in his Father's house,
and here he must stay for a while because here was where he was
meant to be at that precious moment in time.
What if he'd just got up and walked out?
|